Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of
assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
IBA Monitoring
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment
Year of assessment
Threat score (pressure)
Condition score (state)
Action score (response)
2013
high
favourable
medium
Was the whole site covered?
No
State assessed by
unset
Accuracy of information
medium
Threats to the site (pressure)
Threat Level 1
Threat Level 2
Timing
Scope
Severity
Result
Invasive and other problematic species and genes
invasive non-native/alien species/diseases - unspecified species
happening now
majority/most of area/population (50-90%)
slow but significant deterioration
high
Condition of habitat (state)
Habitat
Habitat Detail
Reference Area (ha)
Actual Area (ha)
% of habitat remaining
% of carrying capacity (overall)
Result
Forest
0
0
good (> 90%)
good (> 90%)
favourable
Conservation actions taken at site (response)
Conservation Designation
Management Planning
Conservation Action
Result
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation
A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species
Very little or no conservation action taking place
medium
For more information about IBA monitoring please click here
For further information about the habitat classification please click here.
Land use
Land-use
Extent (% of site)
agriculture
-
forestry
-
nature conservation and research
-
tourism/recreation
-
urban/industrial/transport
-
water management
-
For further information about the land use classification please click here.
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Sitamata Wildlife Sanctuary. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 01/04/2023.
