Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2004
Populations of IBA trigger speciesSpecies | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population estimate | IBA Criteria Triggered |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nilgiri Woodpigeon Columba elphinstonii | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A1, A2 |
White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis | CR | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A1, A3 |
Indian Vulture Gyps indicus | CR | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A1 |
Yellow-throated Bulbul Pycnonotus xantholaemus | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A1, A2, A3 |
Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
2014 | very high | favourable | low |
Was the whole site covered? | Yes | State assessed by | unset |
Accuracy of information | good |
Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Human intrusions and disturbance | recreational activities | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | problematic native species/diseases - unspecified species | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Residential and commercial development | tourism and recreation areas | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Condition of habitat (state) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat Detail | Reference Area (ha) | Actual Area (ha) | % of habitat remaining | % of carrying capacity (overall) | Result |
Forest | 0 | 0 | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Forest | - | |
Shrubland | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Nandi Hills. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 22/03/2023.