Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2004
Populations of IBA trigger speciesSpecies | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population estimate | IBA Criteria Triggered |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Garganey Spatula querquedula | LC | - | 2004 | present | A4i |
Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A1 |
Indian Vulture Gyps indicus | CR | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A1 |
Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga | VU | winter | 2004 | present | A1 |
Malabar Parakeet Nicopsitta columboides | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2 |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | unknown | 2004 | 20,000 individuals | A4iii |
Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
2013 | very high | very unfavourable | low |
Was the whole site covered? | Yes | State assessed by | Habitat |
Accuracy of information | unknown |
Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Human intrusions and disturbance | work and other activities | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | very high |
Pollution | domestic & urban waste water - sewage | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Pollution | garbage & solid waste | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Condition of habitat (state) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat Detail | Reference Area (ha) | Actual Area (ha) | % of habitat remaining | % of carrying capacity (overall) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | 0 | 0 | poor (40-69%) | poor (40-69%) | very unfavourable |
Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management planning has taken place | Unknown | low |
IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - | |
Wetlands (inland) | - | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
water management | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2022) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Carambolim Wetlands. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 17/05/2022.