• Summary
• Text account
• Data table and detailed info
• Map
• Reference and further resources

Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2003

Populations of IBA trigger species

Species	Current IUCN Red List Category	Season	Year(s) of estimate	Population estimate	IBA Criteria Triggered
Green Peafowl Pavo muticus	EN	resident	2001	common	A1
Sarus Crane Antigone antigone	VU	resident	2001	common	A1
Greater Adjutant Leptoptilos dubius	EN	unknown	2001	uncommon	A1
Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus	VU	resident	2001	common	A1
White-shouldered Ibis Pseudibis davisoni	CR	resident	2001	rare	A1
Giant Ibis Thaumatibis gigantea	CR	resident	2001	rare	A1, A4i
Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga	VU	winter	2001	uncommon	A1

Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.

For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here

Threats to the site (pressure)
Threat Level 1	Threat Level 2	Timing	Scope	Severity	Result
Agricultural expansion and intensification	annual & perennial non-timber crops - small-holder farming	happening now	majority/most of area/population (50-90%)	slow but significant deterioration	high
Biological resource use	hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target)	happening now	small area/few individuals (<10%)	slow but significant deterioration	low
Residential and commercial development	housing and urban areas	happening now	small area/few individuals (<10%)	slow but significant deterioration	low
Transportation and service corridors	roads and railroads	happening now	small area/few individuals (<10%)	no or imperceptible deterioration	low

Condition of habitat (state)
Habitat	Habitat Detail	Reference Area (ha)	Actual Area (ha)	% of habitat remaining	% of carrying capacity (overall)	Result
Artificial/Terrestrial	Rice paddies	0	0	moderate (70-90%)	moderate (70-90%)	unfavourable
Shrubland		0	0	moderate (70-90%)	moderate (70-90%)	unfavourable

Conservation actions taken at site (response)
Conservation Designation	Management Planning	Conservation Action	Result
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species)	A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species	Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity	medium

For more information about IBA monitoring please click here

Protection status:

Protected Area	Designation	Area (ha)	Relationship with IBA	Overlap with IBA (ha)
Preah Vihear Temple	Protected Landscape	4,082	protected area overlaps with site	5,000
Preah Vihear	Protected Forest	190,028	protected area overlaps with site	0
Kulen Promtep	Wildlife Sanctuary	406,825	protected area overlaps with site	285,000

IUCN Habitat	Habitat detail	Extent (% of site)
Forest	Lowland evergreen rain forest (tropical), Semi-evergreen rain forest (tropical), Dry deciduous forest (tropical)	-
Shrubland	Secondary scrub	-
Grassland	Edaphic grassland, Secondary grassland	-
Wetlands (inland)	Freshwater lakes and pools, Ephemeral wetlands, Riverine floodplains, Rivers and streams	-
Artificial/Terrestrial	Rice paddies, Perennial crops, orchards and groves, Small settlements, rural gardens	-

For further information about the habitat classification please click here.

Land-use	Extent (% of site)
agriculture	-
forestry	-
military	-
nature conservation and research	-
other	-

For further information about the land use classification please click here.

---

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2021) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Upper Stung Sen Catchment. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 16/01/2021.