Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of
assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
IBA Monitoring
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment
Year of assessment
Threat score (pressure)
Condition score (state)
Action score (response)
2007
low
favourable
high
Was the whole site covered?
No
State assessed by
Habitat
Accuracy of information
-
Threats to the site (pressure)
Threat Level 1
Threat Level 2
Timing
Scope
Severity
Result
Natural system modifications
dams & water management/use - dams (size unknown)
happening now
some of area/population (10-49%)
no or imperceptible deterioration
low
Condition of habitat (state)
Habitat
Habitat Detail
Reference Area (ha)
Actual Area (ha)
% of habitat remaining
% of carrying capacity (overall)
Result
Artificial/Terrestrial
0
0
good (> 90%)
good (> 90%)
favourable
Conservation actions taken at site (response)
Conservation Designation
Management Planning
Conservation Action
Result
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species)
A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species
The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented
high
For more information about IBA monitoring please click here
For further information about the habitat classification please click here.
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Bung Boraphet. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 06/02/2023.
