The site was identified as important in 2000 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species'):Species | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) | Population estimate at site | IBA criteria met |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eastern Imperial Eagle Aquila heliaca | VU | breeding | 1996 | present | A1 |
Booted Eagle Hieraaetus pennatus | LC | breeding | 1996 | 6 breeding pairs | B2 |
The current IUCN Red List category may differ from that which was valid at the time of IBA criteria assessment (2000).
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment (most recent) | State (condition) | Pressure (threat) | Response (action) |
2018 | not assessed | very high | medium |
Was the whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientific name | Common name | Reference population | Actual population | Units | % of population remaining | Result |
Caprimulgus europaeus | European Nightjar | 3 | 3 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Athene noctua | Little Owl | 1 | 1 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Otus scops | 1 | 1 | individuals | 100 | favourable | |
Buteo buteo | 26 | 26 | individuals | 100 | favourable | |
Neophron percnopterus | Egyptian Vulture | 2 | 2 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Circaetus gallicus | 3 | 3 | individuals | 100 | favourable | |
Gyps fulvus | Griffon Vulture | 42 | 42 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Gyps fulvus | Griffon Vulture | 42 | 42 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Aegypius monachus | Cinereous Vulture | 70 | 70 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Aquila heliaca | Eastern Imperial Eagle | 5 | 5 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Hieraaetus pennatus | Booted Eagle | 6 | 3 | breeding pairs | 50 | unfavourable |
Accipiter nisus | Eurasian Sparrowhawk | 14 | 14 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Accipiter gentilis | Northern Goshawk | 2 | 2 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Milvus migrans | 162 | 162 | individuals | 100 | favourable | |
Milvus migrans | 162 | 162 | individuals | 100 | favourable | |
Picus viridis | 1 | 1 | individuals | 100 | favourable | |
Dendrocopos major | Great Spotted Woodpecker | 35 | 35 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Falco naumanni | Lesser Kestrel | 153 | 153 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Falco tinnunculus | Common Kestrel | 5 | 5 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Falco subbuteo | Eurasian Hobby | 6 | 6 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Falco peregrinus | 1 | 1 | individuals | 100 | favourable | |
Lanius collurio | Red-backed Shrike | 48 | 48 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Anthus campestris | Tawny Pipit | 2 | 2 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | livestock farming and ranching (includes forest grazing) - nomadic grazing | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | fire & fire suppression - trend unknown/unrecorded | likely in short term (within 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Pollution | garbage & solid waste | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Transportation and service corridors | roads and railroads | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected-area designation | Management planning | Other conservation action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | medium |
Protected area (PA) | PA designation | PA area (ha) | Relationship of PA with IBA | Overlap of PA with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Alty-Agach goryhy | Zapovednik | 4,400 | protected area contained by site | 4,400 |
Altiaghaj National Park | National Park | 11,035 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
Habitat (IUCN level 1) | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Forest | Broadleaved deciduous woodland, Mixed woodland | - |
Grassland | Steppes and dry calcareous grassland | - |
Wetlands (inland) | Standing freshwater | - |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Area factsheet: Alty Agach area. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/alty-agach-area-iba-azerbaijan on 30/09/2023.