Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2008
Populations of IBA trigger speciesSpecies | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population estimate | IBA Criteria Triggered |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Egyptian Vulture Neophron percnopterus | EN | breeding | 2002-2007 | 1-2 breeding pairs | A1 |
Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga | VU | passage | 2006 | 100 individuals | A1 |
European Roller Coracias garrulus | LC | breeding | 2002-2007 | 10-15 breeding pairs | A1 |
Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni | LC | breeding | 2002-2007 | 10-30 breeding pairs | A1 |
Semi-collared Flycatcher Ficedula semitorquata | LC | breeding | 2002 | 100 breeding pairs | A1 |
Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
2007 | high | near favourable | low |
Was the whole site covered? | Yes | State assessed by | Habitat |
Accuracy of information | medium |
Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | livestock farming and ranching (includes forest grazing) - small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target) | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | logging & wood harvesting - unintentional effects: large scale | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | work and other activities | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Condition of habitat (state) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat Detail | Reference Area (ha) | Actual Area (ha) | % of habitat remaining | % of carrying capacity (overall) | Result |
Forest | 0 | 0 | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable | |
Shrubland | 0 | 0 | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management planning has taken place | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Protected Area | Designation | Area (ha) | Relationship with IBA | Overlap with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kayakentskiy | Zakaznik | 23,700 | protected area contains site | 14,500 |
IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Forest | - | |
Shrubland | Scrub | - |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Highly improved re-seeded landscapes, Arable land, Perennial crops, orchards and groves, Forestry plantations, Urban parks and gardens | - |
Grassland | Humid grasslands, Steppes and dry calcareous grassland | - |
Wetlands (inland) | Rivers and streams | - |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
forestry | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
not utilised | - |
urban/industrial/transport | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2022) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Kayakentski reserve. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 09/08/2022.