The site was identified as important in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species'):Species | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) | Population estimate at site | IBA criteria met |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Semi-collared Flycatcher Ficedula semitorquata | LC | breeding | 2000-2006 | 30-50 breeding pairs | A1 |
The current IUCN Red List category may differ from that which was valid at the time of IBA criteria assessment (2008).
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment (most recent) | State (condition) | Pressure (threat) | Response (action) |
2007 | unfavourable | medium | negligible |
Was the whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat detail | Reference area (ha) | Actual area (ha) | Habitat quantity (% remaining) | Habitat quality (carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | 0 | 0 | good (> 90%) | poor (40-69%) | unfavourable | |
Grassland | 0 | 0 | good (> 90%) | poor (40-69%) | unfavourable | |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | 0 | 0 | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | livestock farming and ranching (includes forest grazing) - agro-industry grazing, ranching or farmin | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | logging & wood harvesting - unintentional effects: large scale | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | recreational activities | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | medium |
Natural system modifications | fire & fire suppression - increase in fire frequency/intensity | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected-area designation | Management planning | Other conservation action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Protected area (PA) | PA designation | PA area (ha) | Relationship of PA with IBA | Overlap of PA with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dahovskiy | Zakaznik | 23,000 | protected area overlaps with site | 700 |
Dahovskaya peschera | Nature Monument | 0 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
Habitat (IUCN level 1) | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Forest | Broadleaved deciduous woodland, Alluvial and very wet forest | - |
Grassland | Humid grasslands | - |
Wetlands (inland) | Rivers and streams | - |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land | - |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
forestry | - |
not utilised | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
urban/industrial/transport | - |
rangeland/pastureland | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Area factsheet: Vicinity of Dakhovka. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/vicinity-of-dakhovka-iba-russia-(european) on 30/09/2023.