The site was identified as important in 2002 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species'):Species | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) | Population estimate at site | IBA criteria met |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Green Peafowl Pavo muticus | EN | resident | 1998 | 14 males | A1 |
Siamese Fireback Lophura diardi | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A1 |
White-winged Duck Asarcornis scutulata | EN | resident | 1998 | 1 breeding pairs | A1 |
Pale-capped Pigeon Columba punicea | VU | resident | 1998 | 1 breeding pairs | A1 |
Grey-faced Tit-babbler Mixornis kelleyi | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A2 |
The current IUCN Red List category may differ from that which was valid at the time of IBA criteria assessment (2002).
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment (most recent) | State (condition) | Pressure (threat) | Response (action) |
2008 | unfavourable | high | negligible |
Was the whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat detail | Reference area (ha) | Actual area (ha) | Habitat quantity (% remaining) | Habitat quality (carrying capacity) | Result |
Shrubland | 10000 | 10000 | - | - | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | annual & perennial non-timber crops - agro-industry farming | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | annual & perennial non-timber crops - shifting agriculture | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - unintentional effects (species is not the target) | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | logging & wood harvesting - unintentional effects: subsistence/small scale | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected-area designation | Management planning | Other conservation action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Habitat (IUCN level 1) | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Forest | Semi-evergreen rain forest (tropical), Moist deciduous forest (tropical), Dry deciduous forest (tropical) | - |
Shrubland | Secondary scrub | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
not utilised | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Area factsheet: Dak Dam. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/dak-dam-iba-vietnam on 27/09/2023.